#rce

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global). View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 9.4 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: Opcenter Intelligence Vulnerabilities: Improper Authentication, Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Deserialization of Untrusted Data, Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could enable an attacker to execute remote code or allow a malicious site administrator to change passwords for users. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Siemens reports that the following products are affected: Siemens O...

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global). View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 9.8 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: SCALANCE W700 Vulnerabilities: Double Free, Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints, Improper Resource Shutdown or Release, Inadequate Encryption Strength, Race Condition, Integer Overflow or Wraparound, Out-of-bounds Write, NULL Pointer Dereference, Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere, Use After Free, Type Confusion, Improper Certificate Validation, Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption, Out-of-bounds Read, Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity, In...

Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Alex Tselegidis EasyAppointments v.1.5.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the legal_settings parameter.

February Microsoft Patch Tuesday. 89 CVEs, 33 added since January. Two with signs of exploitation in the wild: 🔻 EoP – Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (CVE-2025-21418)🔻 EoP – Windows Storage (CVE-2025-21391) There are no vulnerabilities with public exploits, but there are 7 with private ones: 🔸 RCE – Microsoft Edge (CVE-2025-21279, CVE-2025-21283)🔸 Auth. […]

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ Remote code execution is possible in web-accessible installations of hypercube. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ Not yet, though no patch is neccessary if your installation of the microservices is behind a firewall. See below. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ The exploit requires making a request against Hypercube's endpoints; therefore, the ability to make use of the exploit is much reduced if the microservice is not directly accessible from the Internet, so: Prevent general access from the Internet from hitting Hypercube. Furthermore, if you've used any of the official installation methods, your Crayfish will be behind a firewall and there is no work neccessary. The webserver might be made to validate the structure of headers passed, but that would only be neccessary if you publicly exposed the en...

Microsoft’s February Patch Tuesday addresses 63 security vulnerabilities, including two actively exploited zero-days. Update your systems now to…

But there's plenty in it — including two zero-days — that need immediate attention.

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for January of 2025 which includes 58 vulnerabilities, including 3 that Microsoft marked as “critical” and one marked as "moderate". The remaining vulnerabilities listed are classified as “important.”

PandasAI uses an interactive prompt function that is vulnerable to prompt injection and run arbitrary Python code that can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) instead of the intended explanation of the natural language processing by the LLM. The security controls of PandasAI (2.4.3 and earlier) fail to distinguish between legitimate and malicious inputs, allowing the attackers to manipulate the system into executing untrusted code, leading to untrusted code execution (RCE), system compromise, or pivoting attacks on connected services.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack vector is local (AV:L). Why does the CVE title indicate that this is a remote code execution?** The word **Remote** in the title refers to the location of the attacker. This type of exploit is sometimes referred to as Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE). The attack itself is carried out locally. For example, when the score indicates that the **Attack Vector** is **Local** and **User Interaction** is **Required**, this could describe an exploit in which an attacker, through social engineering, convinces a victim to download and open a specially crafted file from a website which leads to a local attack on their computer.